Brand guide

Payette Land Trust · as Sherpas IT understands it

← Back to the proposal

Your brand, as we currently read it.

This is not a brand you commissioned from us, and it is not a critique. It is our working understanding, assembled from your logo file, your live site and your own words — written down so you can correct it before we design anything.

Every item is labelled. Some things you clearly own. Some have never been written down. A few are suggestions of ours, and they are marked as such so you can reject them cleanly.

How to read the labels

Observed

Measured or quoted directly from something you already own. Fact, not opinion.

Not defined

We could not find it. It may exist in a file we have not seen — tell us if so.

Proposed

Our suggestion, used in the sample site. Yours to accept or throw out.


One

The logo

The strongest thing you own, and the source of everything else here.

Payette Land Trust logo
Observed
  • A square badge. Left panel carries a conifer silhouette; right panel carries the wordmark over contour-ploughed field lines.
  • Background is a continuous vertical gradient, sky blue at the top through to meadow green at the bottom.
  • Wordmark is set in bold condensed capitals, stacked on three lines, in white.
  • Source file is an Adobe Illustrator EPS, 458×458pt, CMYK, created December 2021.
Not defined
  • There is no horizontal lockup. The square badge is the only version that exists. That is the single biggest practical gap — a wide website header, an email signature and a document footer all want a horizontal mark.
  • No stated clear-space rule, minimum size, or one-colour/reversed version.
  • No guidance on the badge over photographs.

What this forced in the sample site

Because the badge is square and its wordmark sits inside the artwork, it has to be physically large before the words “Payette Land Trust” become readable. We ended up running it at 104px in the site header, which is larger than a header logo normally sits. A horizontal lockup would solve this properly and is worth commissioning whatever else you decide.


Two

Colour

No palette has been documented, so we sampled your logo directly. These are measured pixel values, not approximations.

Observed — sampled from the logo file

Sky blue

#1E4BE6

Top of the gradient

Mid blue

#247094

Upper gradient

Teal

#257C7A

Gradient midpoint

Meadow green

#2CA51A

Base of the gradient

Field gold

#F4E13F

Contour field lines

Black

#000000

Conifer silhouette

The gradient, as it runs

Not defined
  • No brand palette document exists that we can find.
  • The current website’s colours come from its Divi theme defaults, not from the logo.
  • No CMYK or Pantone equivalents recorded for print.
  • No accessible text/background pairings established.
Proposed

We took the gradient’s two ends and gave them separate jobs rather than reusing the gradient itself, which reads as dated on screen and fights your photography. Green is land, blue is action, gold is the measure of it.

#0E1A17

Text

#16342C

Dark surface

#7E9285

Borders

#F2F0E9

Page

#D8A319

Figures

#2F6FA8

Buttons

The logo stays exactly as it is. It sits on these colours as an accent.


Three

Typefaces

This is the clearest gap. Your current site loads four unrelated fonts, none of them chosen.

Observed — on the live site today
Open SansDivi default
ActorDivi default
Didact GothicDivi default
Source Sans ProDivi default

Four sans-serifs doing overlapping jobs. Nothing distinguishes a heading from a caption except size.

Not defined
  • No typeface is specified for the brand, only whatever the theme shipped with.
  • The logo’s own lettering has not been identified or licensed as a text face.
  • No type scale, weights or line-height conventions.
Proposed

Three faces, each with one job. All are free and open-licensed, so there is nothing to renew.

Headlines

Land that stays land

Archivo, wide and bold — echoes the logo’s capitals.

Body

A conservation easement retires the right to develop your ground — permanently, in a deed filed at the county courthouse.

Newsreader — a reading serif. Reads as a written document rather than a brochure.

Data & labels

VALLEY COUNTY · 1,240 ACRES

IBM Plex Mono — acreage, counties, legal descriptions.

Four

Voice

You already write well. This is the one area needing least work.

Observed — your mission statement, quoted exactly

“Payette Land Trust is dedicated to conserving the rural landscapes of West Central Idaho to benefit our communities; protecting the scenic, agricultural, recreational, historic, and wildlife character of the region.”

Specific, unhurried, no jargon. It is strong enough to carry a homepage unedited, which is how we used it in the sample.

Observed
  • You name places precisely — Valley, Adams, Idaho and Washington counties; the North Fork; Peterson Forest.
  • Your framing is community-first: land protected “to benefit our communities”.
  • Existing series titles have real character — Voices from the Land, Hunt for the Heart.
Not defined
  • No written tone guidance, so consistency depends on who is typing.
  • No agreed shorthand: “PLT” and “Payette Land Trust” are used interchangeably.
  • No standing description of what a conservation easement is, so it gets re-explained differently each time.
Proposed

Two audiences read your site for opposite reasons, and one rule serves both: say the concrete thing. Landowners want to know what they keep and what they give up. Donors want to know the protection is real. Neither is persuaded by adjectives.

Rather this

“You keep the land. The right to subdivide it is retired for good.”

Than this

“We are committed to leveraging innovative conservation solutions for a sustainable future.”


Five

Photography

An asset you are currently under-using.

Observed
  • A real library on your current site: working barns, the Payette braiding through pasture, snow on the high ridge, wildflower pasture, children on conserved ground.
  • It is your own country, not stock. That is rare and immediately obvious to a reader.
  • Currently displayed small, at roughly 400px wide in places.

The sample site uses these photographs at full width and with almost no colour treatment, which is the single biggest visual change from your current site.

Not defined
  • Rights are unconfirmed. We would need to know these are yours to publish, or who took them, before launch.
  • No captions, dates or locations recorded against most images.
  • No guidance on cropping, treatment or when a photograph needs an overlay for text.
  • No consistent naming, which makes finding the right image slow.

Six

To turn this into a real brand guide

None of these are large jobs. Together they are the difference between a brand and a logo.

WhatWhy it mattersWho
A horizontal logo lockup Website headers, email signatures and letterheads all need one. The square badge cannot do this job. Designer
Confirmed colour values Our figures are sampled from a compressed image. Your EPS holds the authoritative CMYK values. You / designer
A decision on typefaces Ends the four-font situation and makes every future document consistent. You, with us
Photography rights confirmed Needed before launch. Also determines whether we can crop and reuse freely. You
The facts we are missing Acres protected, year founded, easement count, staff list. Currently blank in the sample. You
One page of tone guidance So anyone on staff can write for the site and sound like the same organisation. Us, for your approval

If we have this wrong

Tell us. Everything above is inference from public material, and a brand file we have not seen would change several sections. Corrections are more useful to us than agreement.

Back to the proposal